S
Steven Avery
Guest
Hi Core,
Jeremiah 8:8
How do ye say, We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us?
Lo, certainly in vain made he it; the pen of the scribes is in vain.
"shequer" has a wide ranger of meaning than you seem to realize.
Here are a few examples.
Ps 33:17
An horse is a vain thing for safety: neither shall he deliver any by his great strength.
Pr 31:30
Favour is deceitful, and beauty is vain: but a woman that feareth the LORD, she shall be praised.
Jer 3:23
Truly in vain is salvation hoped for from the hills, and from the multitude of mountains: truly in the LORD our God is the salvation of Israel.
I am curious what is your doctrine that you are concerned that the King James Bible Genesis reading contradicts.. a pre-adamic race or something ?
Oh, and your linguists ... would you like to reference their writing on Genesis 1:2 and join me in bringing their "became" theory over to the b-hebrew (biblical hebrew) forum. We could go a bit deeper in that way, and we could bring over the John Adey view for comment as well.
Since you are using this as a primary claim of error and tampering in the King James Bible, would you like to learn more ?
Shalom,
Steven Avery
Jeremiah 8:8
How do ye say, We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us?
Lo, certainly in vain made he it; the pen of the scribes is in vain.
"shequer" has a wide ranger of meaning than you seem to realize.
Here are a few examples.
Ps 33:17
An horse is a vain thing for safety: neither shall he deliver any by his great strength.
Pr 31:30
Favour is deceitful, and beauty is vain: but a woman that feareth the LORD, she shall be praised.
Jer 3:23
Truly in vain is salvation hoped for from the hills, and from the multitude of mountains: truly in the LORD our God is the salvation of Israel.
I am curious what is your doctrine that you are concerned that the King James Bible Genesis reading contradicts.. a pre-adamic race or something ?
Oh, and your linguists ... would you like to reference their writing on Genesis 1:2 and join me in bringing their "became" theory over to the b-hebrew (biblical hebrew) forum. We could go a bit deeper in that way, and we could bring over the John Adey view for comment as well.
Since you are using this as a primary claim of error and tampering in the King James Bible, would you like to learn more ?
Shalom,
Steven Avery