Speak Light
restricted access
.
Would you consider that the Translations does not express Jesus as existing " previously " as only prophetic promise and not the second person of the Trinity
Act 17:29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device.
:30 And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but NOW commandeth all men every where to repent:
if The Old Testament believers were worshiping the Trinity Godhead in a manner that was incorrect and false, how then did Jesus exist " previously " as only prophetic promise and not the second person of the Trinity Godhead ?
The Translation is claiming that God had allowed people to incorrectly worship and disregard the true worship and teaching that - Father, Son, and Holy Spirit existed in three persons in one GODHEAD / TRINITY
And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but NOW commandeth all men every where to repent: - repent for incorrectly thinking that the godhead / trinity was as art and man's device.
How could someone mistakenly or falsely worship something that was never revealed to them or that they never heard of ?
The Trinitarian Translation presents a second person who already pre existed - who is not coming OUT of God, but who already exists in heaven with God and is being re - positioned, re - located and moving from one existing position to another, who is being PROMOTED to be seated literally beside { AT or ON } the throne or AT the right hand of God.
The manuscript says - sit OUT OF my right - Sit IN my right
while the Translation says sit AT / ON my right hand
The Translation attempts to invent a Trinitarian Jesus who already exists in heaven, who is not exiting OUT of God to sit IN the right of God - but he, the Son already exists and is here being promoted and re - located, re - positioned, to sit " ON " beside the throne of the father.
does that make sense ?
Would you consider that the Translations does not express Jesus as existing " previously " as only prophetic promise and not the second person of the Trinity
Act 17:29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device.
:30 And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but NOW commandeth all men every where to repent:
if The Old Testament believers were worshiping the Trinity Godhead in a manner that was incorrect and false, how then did Jesus exist " previously " as only prophetic promise and not the second person of the Trinity Godhead ?
The Translation is claiming that God had allowed people to incorrectly worship and disregard the true worship and teaching that - Father, Son, and Holy Spirit existed in three persons in one GODHEAD / TRINITY
And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but NOW commandeth all men every where to repent: - repent for incorrectly thinking that the godhead / trinity was as art and man's device.
How could someone mistakenly or falsely worship something that was never revealed to them or that they never heard of ?
The Trinitarian Translation presents a second person who already pre existed - who is not coming OUT of God, but who already exists in heaven with God and is being re - positioned, re - located and moving from one existing position to another, who is being PROMOTED to be seated literally beside { AT or ON } the throne or AT the right hand of God.
The manuscript says - sit OUT OF my right - Sit IN my right
while the Translation says sit AT / ON my right hand
The Translation attempts to invent a Trinitarian Jesus who already exists in heaven, who is not exiting OUT of God to sit IN the right of God - but he, the Son already exists and is here being promoted and re - located, re - positioned, to sit " ON " beside the throne of the father.
does that make sense ?
Last edited:
