Israel or Judah? Oh, that one. You know, asking a Bible Student to really and seriously, with historical citations from the book and in rational terms, actually take sides in the Israeli Civil War is pretty advanced. I think it's a very interesting thought problem, although it does remind me quite a bit of "New Math" and is a bit of a nagging doubt.Constantly seeing people trying to say these are the same thing when they are not.
When I asked them they Judah or Israel they go silent.
So let's take a look and discuss the issues.
Israel or Judah? Oh, that one. You know, asking a Bible Student to really and seriously, with historical citations from the book and in rational terms, actually take sides in the Israeli Civil War is pretty advanced. I think it's a very interesting thought problem, although it does remind me quite a bit of "New Math" and is a bit of a nagging doubt.Constantly seeing people trying to say these are the same thing when they are not.
When I asked them they Judah or Israel they go silent.
So let's take a look and discuss the issues.
It's very uncivilized, the United States itself should be trying to unite itself, the North and the South should really be trying harder to be United States. I see the real problems with that though.
The republic has serious problems. There is a class system under every bed, not only real academic classes, but class in terms of money, or occupation, or whether you are or are not personally military, military minded, or from the side that won or the side that lost the Civil War.
Personally, I believe it uncivilized to secretly contravene American due processes by appealing such things to foreign powers, whether Israel, Rome, Greece or even England. However, this type of intellectual historicism is EXTREMELY prevalent in American education, and I myself have been a victim of it.
There are both Americanist and Anti Americanist types of foreign civil war issues gaming, the one in Rome has been by far the most popular for almost a century in the North, which appeals to pity for Lincoln (he was murdered) and to false ideas about freedom (Black Lives Matter).
Excuse me, the topic was the division of the Kingdom of Israel into two parts? Oh, that's right, this is one of those hyper religious forums, no countries exist in it except Israel from prehistoric times to the death of Christ, Paul and John. I always forget how narrow-minded you people are.OFF- TOPIC.Israel or Judah? Oh, that one. You know, asking a Bible Student to really and seriously, with historical citations from the book and in rational terms, actually take sides in the Israeli Civil War is pretty advanced. I think it's a very interesting thought problem, although it does remind me quite a bit of "New Math" and is a bit of a nagging doubt.Constantly seeing people trying to say these are the same thing when they are not.
When I asked them they Judah or Israel they go silent.
So let's take a look and discuss the issues.
It's very uncivilized, the United States itself should be trying to unite itself, the North and the South should really be trying harder to be United States. I see the real problems with that though.
The republic has serious problems. There is a class system under every bed, not only real academic classes, but class in terms of money, or occupation, or whether you are or are not personally military, military minded, or from the side that won or the side that lost the Civil War.
Personally, I believe it uncivilized to secretly contravene American due processes by appealing such things to foreign powers, whether Israel, Rome, Greece or even England. However, this type of intellectual historicism is EXTREMELY prevalent in American education, and I myself have been a victim of it.
There are both Americanist and Anti Americanist types of foreign civil war issues gaming, the one in Rome has been by far the most popular for almost a century in the North, which appeals to pity for Lincoln (he was murdered) and to false ideas about freedom (Black Lives Matter).